Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Excavator

CASE CX210E vs LiuGong 922F

The CASE CX210E and LiuGong 922F are almost identical in operating weight (about 22,500 and 22,000 kg).

The LiuGong 922F has about 7% more engine power (125 kW (168 hp) vs 117 kW (157 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case and LiuGong in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

CASE CX210 crawler excavator loading demolition debris (D-series pictured)
Case CASE CX210E
LiuGong crawler excavator
LiuGong LiuGong 922F
Operating weight 22,500 kg (49,600 lb)22,000 kg (48,500 lb)
Engine power 117 kW (157 hp)125 kW (168 hp)
Net power ≈117 kW (157 hp)≈125 kW (168 hp)
Max. digging depth ≈6.7 m (22 ft)≈6.7 m (22 ft)
Engine Isuzu 4HK1Cummins
Bucket capacity 0.8–1.3 m³ (1.0–1.7 yd³)—
Emissions EPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage V—
Strengths
  • + No DPF to regenerate on Tier 4 Final versions
  • + Smooth hydraulics developed with Sumitomo
  • + Usually priced below Cat and Komatsu
  • + Factory-fitted machine control options
  • + Competitive price
  • + Proven components
Watch-outs
  • − Lower resale value than the market leaders
  • − Dealer density varies by region
  • − Resale value and dealer support vary by region
Full CX210E reviewFull 922F review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.