Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Combine harvester

Case IH Axial-Flow 9250 vs Fendt IDEAL 10T

The Fendt IDEAL 10T has about 23% more engine power (581 kW (779 hp) vs 473 kW (634 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case IH and Fendt in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Case IH Axial-Flow combine harvesting barley
Case IH Case IH Axial-Flow 9250
Fendt IDEAL combine harvester
Fendt Fendt IDEAL 10T
Operating weight ——
Engine power 473 kW (634 hp)581 kW (779 hp)
Max. engine power ≈473 kW (634 hp)—
Engine FPT Cursor 16—
Threshing system Single rotorDual Helix twin rotors
Grain tank ≈14,100 L (400 bu)≈17,100 L (485 bu)
Engine power —≈581 kW (790 hp)
Running gear —TrakRide tracks
Strengths
  • + Gentle threshing with excellent grain quality
  • + Harvest Command automation
  • + Simple design with fewer moving parts
  • + Huge capacity
  • + Long rotors for efficient separation
  • + IDEALharvest automation
Watch-outs
  • − Straw quality lower than walker combines
  • − Fewer machines in the field than Deere or CLAAS, so less dealer experience
Full Axial-Flow 9250 reviewFull IDEAL 10T review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.