Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Forklift

Linde H25 vs Toyota 8FGCU25

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Linde Material Handling and Toyota Material Handling in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Linde internal-combustion forklift (H35 pictured)
Linde Material Handling Linde H25
Cushion-tire forklift loading a beverage delivery truck
Toyota Material Handling Toyota 8FGCU25
Operating weight ——
Engine power ——
Rated capacity 2,500 kg (5,500 lb)2,270 kg (5,000 lb) at 500 mm (24 in)
Fuel Diesel or LPGLPG
Drive Hydrostatic—
Tyres —Cushion
Stability system —Toyota SAS
Strengths
  • + Smooth, precise hydrostatic drive
  • + Low brake wear
  • + Twin-pedal control
  • + Compact for indoor aisles
  • + Fast LPG refuelling
  • + Strong resale
Watch-outs
  • − Higher purchase price
  • − Not suited to rough outdoor surfaces
Full H25 reviewFull 8FGCU25 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.