Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Mobile crusher

Metso Lokotrack LT220D vs Sandvik QJ341

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Metso and Sandvik in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Metso Lokotrack mobile cone crushing plant (LT200HP pictured)
Metso Metso Lokotrack LT220D
Tracked mobile jaw crusher on a low-loader
Sandvik Sandvik QJ341
Operating weight ——
Engine power ——
Crusher Nordberg cone crusher—
On-board screen Yes—
Application Secondary / tertiary crushingQuarrying, demolition, recycling
Feed opening —≈1,200 × 750 mm (47 × 30 in)
Strengths
  • + Two process stages on one chassis
  • + High-quality aggregate
  • + High throughput
  • + Robust design
Watch-outs
  • − Needs a primary jaw crusher in front
  • − Heavier than compact jaw plants
Full Lokotrack LT220D reviewFull QJ341 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.