Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Mobile crusher

Metso Lokotrack LT220D vs Terex Finlay J-1175

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Metso and Terex in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Metso Lokotrack mobile cone crushing plant (LT200HP pictured)
Metso Metso Lokotrack LT220D
Terex Finlay tracked jaw crusher
Terex Terex Finlay J-1175
Operating weight ——
Engine power ——
Crusher Nordberg cone crusher—
On-board screen Yes—
Application Secondary / tertiary crushing—
Feed opening —≈1,100 × 750 mm (43 × 30 in)
Capacity —up to ≈400 t/h
Brand —Terex Finlay
Strengths
  • + Two process stages on one chassis
  • + High-quality aggregate
  • + Hydraulic jaw adjustment
  • + Good mobility
  • + Strong dealer network
Watch-outs
  • − Needs a primary jaw crusher in front
  • − Wear costs in very abrasive rock
Full Lokotrack LT220D reviewFull Finlay J-1175 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.