Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Mobile crusher

Sandvik QJ341 vs Terex Finlay J-1175

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Sandvik and Terex in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Tracked mobile jaw crusher on a low-loader
Sandvik Sandvik QJ341
Terex Finlay tracked jaw crusher
Terex Terex Finlay J-1175
Operating weight ——
Engine power ——
Feed opening ≈1,200 × 750 mm (47 × 30 in)≈1,100 × 750 mm (43 × 30 in)
Application Quarrying, demolition, recycling—
Capacity —up to ≈400 t/h
Brand —Terex Finlay
Strengths
  • + High throughput
  • + Robust design
  • + Hydraulic jaw adjustment
  • + Good mobility
  • + Strong dealer network
Watch-outs
  • − Heavier than compact jaw plants
  • − Wear costs in very abrasive rock
Full QJ341 reviewFull Finlay J-1175 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.