Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Wheeled excavator

Volvo EWR150E vs Wacker Neuson EW100

The Volvo EWR150E is about 60% heavier than the Wacker Neuson EW100 (16,000 vs 10,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Volvo Construction Equipment and Wacker Neuson in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Volvo EWR150E short-swing wheeled excavator
Volvo Construction Equipment Volvo EWR150E
Wacker Neuson EW100 wheeled excavator
Wacker Neuson Wacker Neuson EW100
Operating weight 16,000 kg (35,300 lb)10,000 kg (22,000 lb)
Engine power 115 kW (154 hp)—
Net power ≈115 kW (154 hp)—
Tail swing Short swing radiusReduced
Travel speed up to ≈35 km/h (22 mph)up to ≈20–30 km/h (12–19 mph)
Strengths
  • + Works within one traffic lane
  • + Comfortable Volvo cab
  • + Good lifting stability for its footprint
  • + Compact for city work
  • + Good versatility with tiltrotators
  • + Easy to transport
Watch-outs
  • − Short tail reduces counterweight compared with conventional models
  • − Limited reach compared with larger machines
Full EWR150E reviewFull EW100 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.