Comparison · Mini excavator
Bobcat E10e vs Wacker Neuson ET65
The Wacker Neuson ET65 is about 465% heavier than the Bobcat E10e (6,718 vs 1,189 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Wacker Neuson ET65 has about 425% more engine power (42 kW (56 hp) vs 8 kW (11 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Bobcat and Wacker Neuson in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 1,189 kg (2,600 lb) | 6,718 kg (14,800 lb) |
| Engine power | 8 kW (11 hp) | 42 kW (56 hp) |
| Motor power | 7.5 kW (10 hp) electric | — |
| Max. dig depth | ≈1.82 m (6 ft) | 4.18–4.19 m (13 ft 9 in) |
| Width | 71 cm retracted / 109 cm extended (28 / 43 in) | — |
| Tail swing | Zero tail swing | — |
| Digging breakout force | 5.6 kN (1,260 lbf) | — |
| Battery | Lithium-ion; ≈11.5–12.7 kWh reported by dealers and trade press | — |
| Runtime | A full 8-hour working day with recharging during operator breaks (Bobcat); ≈4 h continuous (dealer figure) | — |
| Fast charging | External super-charger: ≈80% in about 1 hour | — |
| Standard charging | Overnight from a standard 230 V supply (on-board charger) | — |
| Local emissions | Zero exhaust emissions; low noise | — |
| Engine power | — | ≈42 kW (56 hp) |
| Digging radius | — | ≈6.9 m (22 ft 8 in) |
| Breakout force (max.) | — | 50.7 kN (11,400 lbf) |
| Tear-out (biting) force (max.) | — | 30.8 kN (6,920 lbf) |
| Engine | — | Four-cylinder turbo diesel, 2,216 cm³ |
| Boom | — | Monoblock or articulated (adds reach, depth and dump height) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full E10e review | Full ET65 review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.