Comparison · Mini excavator
Bobcat E26 vs Wacker Neuson ET65
The Wacker Neuson ET65 is about 158% heavier than the Bobcat E26 (6,718 vs 2,608 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Wacker Neuson ET65 has about 121% more engine power (42 kW (56 hp) vs 19 kW (25 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Bobcat and Wacker Neuson in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 2,608 kg (5,700 lb) | 6,718 kg (14,800 lb) |
| Engine power | 19 kW (25 hp) | 42 kW (56 hp) |
| Engine power | 18.5 kW (24.8 hp) | ≈42 kW (56 hp) |
| Max. dig depth | 2.57–2.91 m (8 ft 5 in–9 ft 6 in), by arm and region | 4.18–4.19 m (13 ft 9 in) |
| Bucket breakout force | 25.1 kN (5,652 lbf) | — |
| Arm breakout force | 15.8 kN (3,550 lbf) | — |
| Tail swing | Minimal tail swing — ≈89 mm (3.5 in) overhang | — |
| Digging radius | — | ≈6.9 m (22 ft 8 in) |
| Breakout force (max.) | — | 50.7 kN (11,400 lbf) |
| Tear-out (biting) force (max.) | — | 30.8 kN (6,920 lbf) |
| Engine | — | Four-cylinder turbo diesel, 2,216 cm³ |
| Boom | — | Monoblock or articulated (adds reach, depth and dump height) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full E26 review | Full ET65 review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.