Comparison · Mini excavator
Bobcat E50 vs Wacker Neuson ET65
The Wacker Neuson ET65 is about 39% heavier than the Bobcat E50 (6,718 vs 4,843 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Wacker Neuson ET65 has about 14% more engine power (42 kW (56 hp) vs 37 kW (50 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Bobcat and Wacker Neuson in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 4,843 kg (10,700 lb) | 6,718 kg (14,800 lb) |
| Engine power | 37 kW (50 hp) | 42 kW (56 hp) |
| Engine power | 37.1 kW (49.8 hp) | ≈42 kW (56 hp) |
| Max. dig depth | 3.54 m (11 ft 7 in) standard arm; 3.93 m (12 ft 11 in) long arm | 4.18–4.19 m (13 ft 9 in) |
| Max. reach at ground level | 5.94 m (19 ft 6 in), standard arm | — |
| Bucket digging force | 39.9 kN (8,977 lbf) | — |
| Arm digging force | 30.0 kN (6,744 lbf) standard; 25.6 kN (5,751 lbf) long arm | — |
| Digging radius | — | ≈6.9 m (22 ft 8 in) |
| Breakout force (max.) | — | 50.7 kN (11,400 lbf) |
| Tear-out (biting) force (max.) | — | 30.8 kN (6,920 lbf) |
| Engine | — | Four-cylinder turbo diesel, 2,216 cm³ |
| Boom | — | Monoblock or articulated (adds reach, depth and dump height) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full E50 review | Full ET65 review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.