Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Bulldozer

CASE 1650M vs CASE 2050M

The CASE 2050M is about 19% heavier than the CASE 1650M (20,707 vs 17,353 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The CASE 2050M has about 42% more engine power (173 kW (232 hp) vs 122 kW (164 hp)).

CASE 1650M bulldozer
Case CASE 1650M
CASE 2050M bulldozer
Case CASE 2050M
Operating weight 17,353 kg (38,300 lb)20,707 kg (45,700 lb)
Engine power 122 kW (164 hp)173 kW (232 hp)
Power 122 kW (164 hp)173 kW (232 hp)
Blade capacity ≈4.05 m³ (5.3 yd³), 3.96 m wide (dealer data)—
Blade options PAT 3.30 m (130 in) or 3.97 m (156 in); semi-U—
Max. drawbar pull ≈272 kN (61,193 lbf), dealer data—
Drive HydrostaticHydrostatic
Series —CASE M-Series
Strengths
  • + Strong drawbar pull for its size
  • + Hydrostatic drive
  • + Electro-hydraulic controls on later machines
  • + Competitive price
  • + High power for its weight
  • + Hydrostatic drive with full-power turns
  • + Competitive price vs Cat and Komatsu
Watch-outs
  • − Owners have mixed views on EH control feel (see Dirt Perfect review)
  • − Dealer density varies
  • − CASE dealer coverage varies
  • − Fewer technology options than Cat or Komatsu
Full 1650M reviewFull 2050M review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.