Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Bulldozer

CASE 1650M vs Liebherr PR 776

The Liebherr PR 776 is about 318% heavier than the CASE 1650M (72,495 vs 17,353 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Liebherr PR 776 has about 363% more engine power (565 kW (758 hp) vs 122 kW (164 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case and Liebherr in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

CASE 1650M bulldozer
Case CASE 1650M
Liebherr machine similar to the Liebherr PR 776 (related model may be pictured)
Liebherr Liebherr PR 776
Operating weight 17,353 kg (38,300 lb)72,495 kg (159,800 lb)
Engine power 122 kW (164 hp)565 kW (758 hp)
Power 122 kW (164 hp)—
Blade capacity ≈4.05 m³ (5.3 yd³), 3.96 m wide (dealer data)18.5–22 m³ (semi-U 23.5 yd³ / U 28.8 yd³)
Blade options PAT 3.30 m (130 in) or 3.97 m (156 in); semi-U—
Max. drawbar pull ≈272 kN (61,193 lbf), dealer data—
Drive HydrostaticHydrostatic
Engine power —565 kW (768 hp)
Class —Mining dozer
Strengths
  • + Strong drawbar pull for its size
  • + Hydrostatic drive
  • + Electro-hydraulic controls on later machines
  • + Competitive price
  • + Hydrostatic drive at mining scale — no gear shifts, full-power turns
  • + High productivity per litre (Liebherr claims for hydrostatic efficiency)
  • + New G8 generation
Watch-outs
  • − Owners have mixed views on EH control feel (see Dirt Perfect review)
  • − Dealer density varies
  • − Mining-scale costs
  • − Fewer units in service than Cat or Komatsu mining dozers
Full 1650M reviewFull PR 776 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.