Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Bulldozer

CASE 2050M vs Liebherr PR 776

The Liebherr PR 776 is about 250% heavier than the CASE 2050M (72,495 vs 20,707 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Liebherr PR 776 has about 227% more engine power (565 kW (758 hp) vs 173 kW (232 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case and Liebherr in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

CASE 2050M bulldozer
Case CASE 2050M
Liebherr machine similar to the Liebherr PR 776 (related model may be pictured)
Liebherr Liebherr PR 776
Operating weight 20,707 kg (45,700 lb)72,495 kg (159,800 lb)
Engine power 173 kW (232 hp)565 kW (758 hp)
Power 173 kW (232 hp)—
Drive HydrostaticHydrostatic
Series CASE M-Series—
Engine power —565 kW (768 hp)
Blade capacity —18.5–22 m³ (semi-U 23.5 yd³ / U 28.8 yd³)
Class —Mining dozer
Strengths
  • + High power for its weight
  • + Hydrostatic drive with full-power turns
  • + Competitive price vs Cat and Komatsu
  • + Hydrostatic drive at mining scale — no gear shifts, full-power turns
  • + High productivity per litre (Liebherr claims for hydrostatic efficiency)
  • + New G8 generation
Watch-outs
  • − CASE dealer coverage varies
  • − Fewer technology options than Cat or Komatsu
  • − Mining-scale costs
  • − Fewer units in service than Cat or Komatsu mining dozers
Full 2050M reviewFull PR 776 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.