Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Bulldozer

CASE 650M vs Liebherr PR 776

The Liebherr PR 776 is about 835% heavier than the CASE 650M (72,495 vs 7,756 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Liebherr PR 776 has about 927% more engine power (565 kW (758 hp) vs 55 kW (74 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case and Liebherr in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

CASE 650M bulldozer
Case CASE 650M
Liebherr machine similar to the Liebherr PR 776 (related model may be pictured)
Liebherr Liebherr PR 776
Operating weight 7,756 kg (17,100 lb)72,495 kg (159,800 lb)
Engine power 55 kW (74 hp)565 kW (758 hp)
Power 55 kW (74 hp)—
Drive HydrostaticHydrostatic
Series CASE M-Series—
Engine power —565 kW (768 hp)
Blade capacity —18.5–22 m³ (semi-U 23.5 yd³ / U 28.8 yd³)
Class —Mining dozer
Strengths
  • + Light and easy to transport
  • + Hydrostatic drive for smooth grading
  • + Lower price than Cat and Deere equivalents
  • + Hydrostatic drive at mining scale — no gear shifts, full-power turns
  • + High productivity per litre (Liebherr claims for hydrostatic efficiency)
  • + New G8 generation
Watch-outs
  • − Small for production pushing
  • − Being succeeded by the N-Series
  • − Mining-scale costs
  • − Fewer units in service than Cat or Komatsu mining dozers
Full 650M reviewFull PR 776 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.