Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Bulldozer

CASE 850M vs Liebherr PR 776

The Liebherr PR 776 is about 614% heavier than the CASE 850M (72,495 vs 10,152 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Liebherr PR 776 has about 528% more engine power (565 kW (758 hp) vs 90 kW (121 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case and Liebherr in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

CASE 850M bulldozer
Case CASE 850M
Liebherr machine similar to the Liebherr PR 776 (related model may be pictured)
Liebherr Liebherr PR 776
Operating weight 10,152 kg (22,400 lb)72,495 kg (159,800 lb)
Engine power 90 kW (121 hp)565 kW (758 hp)
Power 90 kW (120 hp)—
Drive HydrostaticHydrostatic
Series CASE M-Series—
Engine power —565 kW (768 hp)
Blade capacity —18.5–22 m³ (semi-U 23.5 yd³ / U 28.8 yd³)
Class —Mining dozer
Strengths
  • + Strong power for its weight
  • + Hydrostatic drive
  • + Good value
  • + Praised by reviewers as underrated
  • + Hydrostatic drive at mining scale — no gear shifts, full-power turns
  • + High productivity per litre (Liebherr claims for hydrostatic efficiency)
  • + New G8 generation
Watch-outs
  • − CASE dealer density varies
  • − Mining-scale costs
  • − Fewer units in service than Cat or Komatsu mining dozers
Full 850M reviewFull PR 776 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.