Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Excavator

CASE CX210E vs Caterpillar 320

The Caterpillar 320 has about 3% more engine power (121 kW (162 hp) vs 117 kW (157 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case and Caterpillar in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

CASE CX210 crawler excavator loading demolition debris (D-series pictured)
Case CASE CX210E
Caterpillar 320 hydraulic excavator digging on a site
Caterpillar Caterpillar 320
Operating weight 22,500 kg (49,600 lb)22,500 kg (49,600 lb)
Engine power 117 kW (157 hp)121 kW (162 hp)
Net power ≈117 kW (157 hp)≈121 kW (162 hp)
Max. digging depth ≈6.7 m (22 ft)≈6.7 m (22 ft)
Engine Isuzu 4HK1Cat C7.1
Bucket capacity 0.8–1.3 m³ (1.0–1.7 yd³)0.9–1.5 m³ (1.2–2.0 yd³)
Emissions EPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage VEPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage V
Max. reach at ground level —≈9.9 m (32 ft 6 in)
Fuel tank —≈345 L (91 US gal)
Strengths
  • + No DPF to regenerate on Tier 4 Final versions
  • + Smooth hydraulics developed with Sumitomo
  • + Usually priced below Cat and Komatsu
  • + Factory-fitted machine control options
  • + Factory-integrated Cat Grade with 2D and Assist features
  • + Up to 25% lower maintenance cost than the previous F-series, according to Cat
  • + Excellent resale value and dealer support worldwide
Watch-outs
  • − Lower resale value than the market leaders
  • − Dealer density varies by region
  • − Higher purchase price than most rivals
  • − Technology packages add significant cost
  • − Electronic complexity can mean dealer-only diagnostics
Full CX210E reviewFull 320 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.