Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Excavator

CASE CX210E vs Caterpillar 349

The Caterpillar 349 is about 120% heavier than the CASE CX210E (49,500 vs 22,500 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Caterpillar 349 has about 166% more engine power (311 kW (417 hp) vs 117 kW (157 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case and Caterpillar in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

CASE CX210 crawler excavator loading demolition debris (D-series pictured)
Case CASE CX210E
Caterpillar 349
Caterpillar Caterpillar 349
Operating weight 22,500 kg (49,600 lb)49,500 kg (109,100 lb)
Engine power 117 kW (157 hp)311 kW (417 hp)
Net power ≈117 kW (157 hp)≈311 kW (417 hp)
Max. digging depth ≈6.7 m (22 ft)≈7.9 m (25 ft 11 in)
Engine Isuzu 4HK1Cat C13
Bucket capacity 0.8–1.3 m³ (1.0–1.7 yd³)—
Emissions EPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage V—
Strengths
  • + No DPF to regenerate on Tier 4 Final versions
  • + Smooth hydraulics developed with Sumitomo
  • + Usually priced below Cat and Komatsu
  • + Factory-fitted machine control options
  • + High digging forces
  • + Large bucket range
  • + Technology for production monitoring
Watch-outs
  • − Lower resale value than the market leaders
  • − Dealer density varies by region
  • − Transport requires disassembly or special permits
Full CX210E reviewFull 349 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.