Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Excavator

CASE CX210E vs Caterpillar 374

The Caterpillar 374 is about 222% heavier than the CASE CX210E (72,500 vs 22,500 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Caterpillar 374 has about 201% more engine power (352 kW (472 hp) vs 117 kW (157 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case and Caterpillar in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

CASE CX210 crawler excavator loading demolition debris (D-series pictured)
Case CASE CX210E
Caterpillar Caterpillar 374
Operating weight 22,500 kg (49,600 lb)72,500 kg (159,800 lb)
Engine power 117 kW (157 hp)352 kW (472 hp)
Net power ≈117 kW (157 hp)≈352 kW (472 hp)
Max. digging depth ≈6.7 m (22 ft)—
Engine Isuzu 4HK1Cat C15
Bucket capacity 0.8–1.3 m³ (1.0–1.7 yd³)—
Emissions EPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage V—
Strengths
  • + No DPF to regenerate on Tier 4 Final versions
  • + Smooth hydraulics developed with Sumitomo
  • + Usually priced below Cat and Komatsu
  • + Factory-fitted machine control options
  • + Massive digging forces
  • + Robust structures for rock work
Watch-outs
  • − Lower resale value than the market leaders
  • − Dealer density varies by region
  • − Needs large haul trucks to be efficient
Full CX210E reviewFull 374 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.