Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Excavator

CASE CX210E vs Komatsu PC290LC-11

The Komatsu PC290LC-11 is about 36% heavier than the CASE CX210E (30,500 vs 22,500 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Komatsu PC290LC-11 has about 26% more engine power (147 kW (197 hp) vs 117 kW (157 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case and Komatsu in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

CASE CX210 crawler excavator loading demolition debris (D-series pictured)
Case CASE CX210E
Komatsu machine similar to the Komatsu PC290LC-11 (related model may be pictured)
Komatsu Komatsu PC290LC-11
Operating weight 22,500 kg (49,600 lb)30,500 kg (67,200 lb)
Engine power 117 kW (157 hp)147 kW (197 hp)
Net power ≈117 kW (157 hp)≈147 kW (197 hp)
Max. digging depth ≈6.7 m (22 ft)≈7.4 m (24 ft 3 in)
Engine Isuzu 4HK1—
Bucket capacity 0.8–1.3 m³ (1.0–1.7 yd³)—
Emissions EPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage V—
Strengths
  • + No DPF to regenerate on Tier 4 Final versions
  • + Smooth hydraulics developed with Sumitomo
  • + Usually priced below Cat and Komatsu
  • + Factory-fitted machine control options
  • + Good balance of size and production
  • + Smooth hydraulics
  • + iMC version available
Watch-outs
  • − Lower resale value than the market leaders
  • − Dealer density varies by region
  • − Heavier transport than 20–25 t machines
Full CX210E reviewFull PC290LC-11 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.