Comparison · Excavator

CASE CX210E vs Volvo EC220E

The Volvo EC220E is about 4% heavier than the CASE CX210E (23,500 vs 22,500 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Volvo EC220E has about 4% more engine power (122 kW (164 hp) vs 117 kW (157 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

	Case CASE CX210E	Volvo Construction Equipment Volvo EC220E
Operating weight	22,500 kg (49,600 lb)	23,500 kg (51,800 lb)
Engine power	117 kW (157 hp)	122 kW (164 hp)
Net power	≈117 kW (157 hp)	≈122 kW (164 hp)
Max. digging depth	≈6.7 m (22 ft)	≈6.7 m (22 ft)
Engine	Isuzu 4HK1	Volvo D6J
Bucket capacity	0.8–1.3 m³ (1.0–1.7 yd³)	0.8–1.6 m³ (1.0–2.1 yd³)
Emissions	EPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage V	EU Stage V / EPA Tier 4 Final
Strengths	+ No DPF to regenerate on Tier 4 Final versions + Smooth hydraulics developed with Sumitomo + Usually priced below Cat and Komatsu + Factory-fitted machine control options	+ Quiet, spacious cab with excellent visibility + ECO mode and automatic engine shut-down cut fuel use + Volvo Active Control option for semi-automatic grading + Good serviceability with ground-level access
Watch-outs	− Lower resale value than the market leaders − Dealer density varies by region	− Dealer coverage weaker than Cat and Komatsu in some regions − Resale values slightly lower than Cat in North America
	Full CX210E review	Full EC220E review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.