Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Excavator

CASE CX210E vs XCMG XE215DA

The CASE CX210E is about 3% heavier than the XCMG XE215DA (22,500 vs 21,750 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The XCMG XE215DA has about 3% more engine power (120 kW (161 hp) vs 117 kW (157 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case and XCMG in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

CASE CX210 crawler excavator loading demolition debris (D-series pictured)
Case CASE CX210E
XCMG DA-series excavator (XE60DA pictured, a smaller sibling of the XE215DA)
XCMG XCMG XE215DA
Operating weight 22,500 kg (49,600 lb)21,750 kg (48,000 lb)
Engine power 117 kW (157 hp)120 kW (161 hp)
Net power ≈117 kW (157 hp)≈120 kW (161 hp)
Max. digging depth ≈6.7 m (22 ft)≈6.6 m (21 ft 8 in)
Engine Isuzu 4HK1Cummins (typical export spec)
Bucket capacity 0.8–1.3 m³ (1.0–1.7 yd³)≈1.0–1.2 m³ (1.3–1.6 yd³)
Emissions EPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage V—
Strengths
  • + No DPF to regenerate on Tier 4 Final versions
  • + Smooth hydraulics developed with Sumitomo
  • + Usually priced below Cat and Komatsu
  • + Factory-fitted machine control options
  • + Competitive price
  • + Robust structure suited to tough markets
  • + Wide availability in Asia, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America
Watch-outs
  • − Lower resale value than the market leaders
  • − Dealer density varies by region
  • − Limited dealer presence in North America and Western Europe
  • − Lower resale value
  • − Fewer factory technology options
Full CX210E reviewFull XE215DA review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.