Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Combine harvester

Case IH Axial-Flow 8250 vs Case IH Axial-Flow 9250

The Case IH Axial-Flow 9250 has about 35% more engine power (473 kW (634 hp) vs 350 kW (469 hp)).

Case IH Axial-Flow 8250 combine harvester
Case IH Case IH Axial-Flow 8250
Case IH Axial-Flow combine harvesting barley
Case IH Case IH Axial-Flow 9250
Operating weight ——
Engine power 350 kW (469 hp)473 kW (634 hp)
Engine power ≈350 kW (473 hp)—
Threshing system Single rotorSingle rotor
Max. engine power —≈473 kW (634 hp)
Engine —FPT Cursor 16
Grain tank —≈14,100 L (400 bu)
Strengths
  • + Proven Axial-Flow
  • + Automation
  • + Gentle threshing with excellent grain quality
  • + Harvest Command automation
  • + Simple design with fewer moving parts
Watch-outs
  • − Straw quality lower than walkers
  • − Straw quality lower than walker combines
Full Axial-Flow 8250 reviewFull Axial-Flow 9250 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.