Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Combine harvester

Case IH Axial-Flow 8250 vs New Holland CX8.90

The Case IH Axial-Flow 8250 has about 3% more engine power (350 kW (469 hp) vs 340 kW (456 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case IH and New Holland in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Case IH Case IH Axial-Flow 8250
New Holland CX8.90
New Holland New Holland CX8.90
Operating weight ——
Engine power 350 kW (469 hp)340 kW (456 hp)
Engine power ≈350 kW (473 hp)≈340 kW (460 hp)
Threshing system Single rotorDrum + walkers
Strengths
  • + Proven Axial-Flow
  • + Automation
  • + Good straw
  • + High capacity for a walker
Watch-outs
  • − Straw quality lower than walkers
  • − Less capacity than rotary
Full Axial-Flow 8250 reviewFull CX8.90 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.