Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Combine harvester

Case IH Axial-Flow 9250 vs CLAAS TRION 750

The Case IH Axial-Flow 9250 has about 58% more engine power (473 kW (634 hp) vs 300 kW (402 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case IH and CLAAS in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Case IH Axial-Flow combine harvesting barley
Case IH Case IH Axial-Flow 9250
CLAAS TRION 750 combine harvester
CLAAS CLAAS TRION 750
Operating weight ——
Engine power 473 kW (634 hp)300 kW (402 hp)
Max. engine power ≈473 kW (634 hp)—
Engine FPT Cursor 16—
Threshing system Single rotorHybrid (MONTANA, TERRA TRAC options)
Grain tank ≈14,100 L (400 bu)—
Engine power —≈300 kW (408 hp)
Strengths
  • + Gentle threshing with excellent grain quality
  • + Harvest Command automation
  • + Simple design with fewer moving parts
  • + Flexible configuration
  • + Good value for CLAAS
Watch-outs
  • − Straw quality lower than walker combines
  • − Less capacity than LEXION
Full Axial-Flow 9250 reviewFull TRION 750 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.