Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Combine harvester

Case IH Axial-Flow 9250 vs John Deere X9 1100

The John Deere X9 1100 has about 8% more engine power (511 kW (685 hp) vs 473 kW (634 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case IH and John Deere in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Case IH Axial-Flow combine harvesting barley
Case IH Case IH Axial-Flow 9250
John Deere X9 1100
John Deere John Deere X9 1100
Operating weight ——
Engine power 473 kW (634 hp)511 kW (685 hp)
Max. engine power ≈473 kW (634 hp)—
Engine FPT Cursor 16—
Threshing system Single rotorTwin rotors
Grain tank ≈14,100 L (400 bu)≈21,500 L (610 bu)
Engine power —≈511 kW (690 hp)
Strengths
  • + Gentle threshing with excellent grain quality
  • + Harvest Command automation
  • + Simple design with fewer moving parts
  • + Huge capacity
  • + Advanced automation
Watch-outs
  • − Straw quality lower than walker combines
  • − Very high price
Full Axial-Flow 9250 reviewFull X9 1100 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.