Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Combine harvester

Case IH Axial-Flow 9250 vs New Holland CR10.90

The New Holland CR10.90 has about 5% more engine power (498 kW (668 hp) vs 473 kW (634 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case IH and New Holland in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Case IH Axial-Flow combine harvesting barley
Case IH Case IH Axial-Flow 9250
New Holland CR twin-rotor combine harvester (CR960 pictured)
New Holland New Holland CR10.90
Operating weight ——
Engine power 473 kW (634 hp)498 kW (668 hp)
Max. engine power ≈473 kW (634 hp)≈480–515 kW (650–700 hp), by market
Engine FPT Cursor 16FPT Cursor 16
Threshing system Single rotorTwin Rotor
Grain tank ≈14,100 L (400 bu)up to ≈20,000 L (570 bu)
Strengths
  • + Gentle threshing with excellent grain quality
  • + Harvest Command automation
  • + Simple design with fewer moving parts
  • + Very high capacity
  • + Gentle twin-rotor threshing
  • + Huge grain tank
Watch-outs
  • − Straw quality lower than walker combines
  • − Large, expensive machine
Full Axial-Flow 9250 reviewFull CR10.90 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.