Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Combine harvester

Case IH Axial-Flow 9250 vs New Holland CX8.90

The Case IH Axial-Flow 9250 has about 39% more engine power (473 kW (634 hp) vs 340 kW (456 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case IH and New Holland in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Case IH Axial-Flow combine harvesting barley
Case IH Case IH Axial-Flow 9250
New Holland CX8.90
New Holland New Holland CX8.90
Operating weight ——
Engine power 473 kW (634 hp)340 kW (456 hp)
Max. engine power ≈473 kW (634 hp)—
Engine FPT Cursor 16—
Threshing system Single rotorDrum + walkers
Grain tank ≈14,100 L (400 bu)—
Engine power —≈340 kW (460 hp)
Strengths
  • + Gentle threshing with excellent grain quality
  • + Harvest Command automation
  • + Simple design with fewer moving parts
  • + Good straw
  • + High capacity for a walker
Watch-outs
  • − Straw quality lower than walker combines
  • − Less capacity than rotary
Full Axial-Flow 9250 reviewFull CX8.90 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.