Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Compact track loader

CASE TR340B vs Caterpillar 279D3

The CASE TR340B has about 22% more engine power (67 kW (90 hp) vs 55 kW (74 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case and Caterpillar in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

CASE TR340B compact track loader
Case CASE TR340B
Caterpillar machine similar to the Caterpillar 279D3 (related model may be pictured)
Caterpillar Caterpillar 279D3
Operating weight ——
Engine power 67 kW (90 hp)55 kW (74 hp)
Rated operating capacity ≈1,540 kg (3,400 lb)≈1,180 kg (2,600 lb)
Engine power ≈67 kW (90 hp)—
Lift path VerticalRadial
Net power —≈55 kW (74 hp)
Strengths
  • + High capacity
  • + Good value
  • + Strong breakout
  • + Good for grading
Watch-outs
  • − Heavier transport
  • − Less reach at height
Full TR340B reviewFull 279D3 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.