Comparison · Compact track loader
CASE TR340B vs Caterpillar 289D3
The CASE TR340B has about 22% more engine power (67 kW (90 hp) vs 55 kW (74 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case and Caterpillar in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | — | — |
| Engine power | 67 kW (90 hp) | 55 kW (74 hp) |
| Rated operating capacity | ≈1,540 kg (3,400 lb) | ≈1,320 kg (2,900 lb) |
| Engine power | ≈67 kW (90 hp) | — |
| Lift path | Vertical | Vertical |
| Net power | — | ≈55 kW (74 hp) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full TR340B review | Full 289D3 review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.