Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Excavator

Caterpillar 320 vs JCB 131X

The Caterpillar 320 is about 73% heavier than the JCB 131X (22,500 vs 13,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Caterpillar 320 has about 120% more engine power (121 kW (162 hp) vs 55 kW (74 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and JCB in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Caterpillar 320 hydraulic excavator digging on a site
Caterpillar Caterpillar 320
JCB JCB 131X
Operating weight 22,500 kg (49,600 lb)13,000 kg (28,700 lb)
Engine power 121 kW (162 hp)55 kW (74 hp)
Net power ≈121 kW (162 hp)—
Max. digging depth ≈6.7 m (22 ft)—
Engine Cat C7.1—
Max. reach at ground level ≈9.9 m (32 ft 6 in)—
Bucket capacity 0.9–1.5 m³ (1.2–2.0 yd³)—
Fuel tank ≈345 L (91 US gal)—
Emissions EPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage V—
Engine power —≈55 kW (74 hp)
Strengths
  • + Factory-integrated Cat Grade with 2D and Assist features
  • + Up to 25% lower maintenance cost than the previous F-series, according to Cat
  • + Excellent resale value and dealer support worldwide
  • + Fuel efficient
  • + Comfortable cab
Watch-outs
  • − Higher purchase price than most rivals
  • − Technology packages add significant cost
  • − Electronic complexity can mean dealer-only diagnostics
  • − Modest power for heavy attachments
Full 320 reviewFull 131X review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.