Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Excavator

Caterpillar 320 vs Komatsu PC290LC-11

The Komatsu PC290LC-11 is about 36% heavier than the Caterpillar 320 (30,500 vs 22,500 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Komatsu PC290LC-11 has about 21% more engine power (147 kW (197 hp) vs 121 kW (162 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Komatsu in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Caterpillar 320 hydraulic excavator digging on a site
Caterpillar Caterpillar 320
Komatsu machine similar to the Komatsu PC290LC-11 (related model may be pictured)
Komatsu Komatsu PC290LC-11
Operating weight 22,500 kg (49,600 lb)30,500 kg (67,200 lb)
Engine power 121 kW (162 hp)147 kW (197 hp)
Net power ≈121 kW (162 hp)≈147 kW (197 hp)
Max. digging depth ≈6.7 m (22 ft)≈7.4 m (24 ft 3 in)
Engine Cat C7.1—
Max. reach at ground level ≈9.9 m (32 ft 6 in)—
Bucket capacity 0.9–1.5 m³ (1.2–2.0 yd³)—
Fuel tank ≈345 L (91 US gal)—
Emissions EPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage V—
Strengths
  • + Factory-integrated Cat Grade with 2D and Assist features
  • + Up to 25% lower maintenance cost than the previous F-series, according to Cat
  • + Excellent resale value and dealer support worldwide
  • + Good balance of size and production
  • + Smooth hydraulics
  • + iMC version available
Watch-outs
  • − Higher purchase price than most rivals
  • − Technology packages add significant cost
  • − Electronic complexity can mean dealer-only diagnostics
  • − Heavier transport than 20–25 t machines
Full 320 reviewFull PC290LC-11 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.