Comparison · Excavator
Caterpillar 320 vs Volvo EC140E
The Caterpillar 320 is about 50% heavier than the Volvo EC140E (22,500 vs 15,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 320 has about 55% more engine power (121 kW (162 hp) vs 78 kW (105 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 22,500 kg (49,600 lb) | 15,000 kg (33,100 lb) |
| Engine power | 121 kW (162 hp) | 78 kW (105 hp) |
| Net power | ≈121 kW (162 hp) | ≈78 kW (105 hp) |
| Max. digging depth | ≈6.7 m (22 ft) | ≈6.0 m (19 ft 8 in) |
| Engine | Cat C7.1 | — |
| Max. reach at ground level | ≈9.9 m (32 ft 6 in) | — |
| Bucket capacity | 0.9–1.5 m³ (1.2–2.0 yd³) | — |
| Fuel tank | ≈345 L (91 US gal) | — |
| Emissions | EPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage V | — |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 320 review | Full EC140E review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.