Comparison · Excavator
Caterpillar 320 vs Volvo EC300E
The Volvo EC300E is about 37% heavier than the Caterpillar 320 (30,750 vs 22,500 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Volvo EC300E has about 49% more engine power (180 kW (241 hp) vs 121 kW (162 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 22,500 kg (49,600 lb) | 30,750 kg (67,800 lb) |
| Engine power | 121 kW (162 hp) | 180 kW (241 hp) |
| Net power | ≈121 kW (162 hp) | ≈180 kW (241 hp) |
| Max. digging depth | ≈6.7 m (22 ft) | ≈7.3 m (24 ft) |
| Engine | Cat C7.1 | — |
| Max. reach at ground level | ≈9.9 m (32 ft 6 in) | — |
| Bucket capacity | 0.9–1.5 m³ (1.2–2.0 yd³) | — |
| Fuel tank | ≈345 L (91 US gal) | — |
| Emissions | EPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage V | — |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 320 review | Full EC300E review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.