Comparison · Excavator
Caterpillar 320 vs XCMG XE215DA
The Caterpillar 320 is about 3% heavier than the XCMG XE215DA (22,500 vs 21,750 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
Engine output is effectively the same on both machines.
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and XCMG in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 22,500 kg (49,600 lb) | 21,750 kg (48,000 lb) |
| Engine power | 121 kW (162 hp) | 120 kW (161 hp) |
| Net power | ≈121 kW (162 hp) | ≈120 kW (161 hp) |
| Max. digging depth | ≈6.7 m (22 ft) | ≈6.6 m (21 ft 8 in) |
| Engine | Cat C7.1 | Cummins (typical export spec) |
| Max. reach at ground level | ≈9.9 m (32 ft 6 in) | — |
| Bucket capacity | 0.9–1.5 m³ (1.2–2.0 yd³) | ≈1.0–1.2 m³ (1.3–1.6 yd³) |
| Fuel tank | ≈345 L (91 US gal) | — |
| Emissions | EPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage V | — |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 320 review | Full XE215DA review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.