Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Excavator

Caterpillar 336 vs Volvo EC140E

The Caterpillar 336 is about 147% heavier than the Volvo EC140E (37,000 vs 15,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Caterpillar 336 has about 197% more engine power (232 kW (311 hp) vs 78 kW (105 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Caterpillar 336
Caterpillar Caterpillar 336
Volvo Construction Equipment Volvo EC140E
Operating weight 37,000 kg (81,600 lb)15,000 kg (33,100 lb)
Engine power 232 kW (311 hp)78 kW (105 hp)
Net power ≈232 kW (311 hp)≈78 kW (105 hp)
Max. digging depth ≈7.5 m (24 ft 7 in)≈6.0 m (19 ft 8 in)
Engine Cat C9.3B—
Strengths
  • + High production for truck loading
  • + Integrated Payload weighing
  • + Good fuel efficiency for its class
  • + Comfortable cab
  • + Good fuel economy
Watch-outs
  • − Requires a permit-class lowboy in many regions
  • − Conventional tail needs space
Full 336 reviewFull EC140E review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.