Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Compact wheel loader

Caterpillar 906 vs Volvo L25 Electric

The Caterpillar 906 is about 10% heavier than the Volvo L25 Electric (5,500 vs 5,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Caterpillar compact wheel loader on a Paris square
Caterpillar Caterpillar 906
Volvo L25 Electric compact wheel loader
Volvo Construction Equipment Volvo L25 Electric
Operating weight 5,500 kg (12,100 lb)5,000 kg (11,000 lb)
Engine power 55 kW (74 hp)—
Net power ≈55 kW (74 hp)—
Bucket capacity ≈0.9–1.2 m³ (1.2–1.6 yd³)—
Drive Hydrostatic—
Battery —Lithium-ion, ≈40 kWh
Emissions at point of use —Zero
Strengths
  • + Smooth hydrostatic drive
  • + Good visibility
  • + Cat dealer support
  • + Zero emissions and very low noise
  • + Low running costs
  • + Good for indoor and urban work
Watch-outs
  • − Higher price than many rivals
  • − Higher purchase price
  • − Runtime depends on duty cycle
Full 906 reviewFull L25 Electric review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.