Comparison · Compact wheel loader
Caterpillar 906 vs Volvo L30G
The Caterpillar 906 is about 5% heavier than the Volvo L30G (5,500 vs 5,250 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 906 has about 38% more engine power (55 kW (74 hp) vs 40 kW (54 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 5,500 kg (12,100 lb) | 5,250 kg (11,600 lb) |
| Engine power | 55 kW (74 hp) | 40 kW (54 hp) |
| Net power | ≈55 kW (74 hp) | — |
| Bucket capacity | ≈0.9–1.2 m³ (1.2–1.6 yd³) | — |
| Drive | Hydrostatic | — |
| Engine power | — | ≈40 kW (54 hp) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 906 review | Full L30G review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.