Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Compact wheel loader

Caterpillar 906 vs Wacker Neuson WL52

The Caterpillar 906 is about 16% heavier than the Wacker Neuson WL52 (5,500 vs 4,750 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Wacker Neuson in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Caterpillar compact wheel loader on a Paris square
Caterpillar Caterpillar 906
Wacker Neuson compact wheel loader on display
Wacker Neuson Wacker Neuson WL52
Operating weight 5,500 kg (12,100 lb)4,750 kg (10,500 lb)
Engine power 55 kW (74 hp)—
Net power ≈55 kW (74 hp)—
Bucket capacity ≈0.9–1.2 m³ (1.2–1.6 yd³)≈0.75 m³ (1 yd³)
Drive HydrostaticHydrostatic
Strengths
  • + Smooth hydrostatic drive
  • + Good visibility
  • + Cat dealer support
  • + Compact and agile
  • + Good value
  • + Wide attachment range
Watch-outs
  • − Higher price than many rivals
  • − Smaller dealer network in North America
Full 906 reviewFull WL52 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.