Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 926 vs Komatsu WA600-8
The Komatsu WA600-8 is about 333% heavier than the Caterpillar 926 (55,000 vs 12,688 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Komatsu WA600-8 has about 220% more engine power (393 kW (527 hp) vs 123 kW (165 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Komatsu in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 12,688 kg (28,000 lb) | 55,000 kg (121,300 lb) |
| Engine power | 123 kW (165 hp) | 393 kW (527 hp) |
| Engine power | ≈123 kW (165 hp) | — |
| Bucket capacity | 1.9–5.0 m³ (2.5–6.5 yd³), incl. light-material buckets | ≈6.4–7.6 m³ (8.4–9.9 yd³) |
| Engine | Cat C7.1 | — |
| Drive | Hydrostatic | — |
| Emissions | US EPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage V | — |
| Net power | — | ≈393 kW (527 hp) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 926 review | Full WA600-8 review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.