Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 926 vs Volvo L150H
The Volvo L150H is about 92% heavier than the Caterpillar 926 (25,000 vs 13,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Volvo L150H has about 96% more engine power (222 kW (298 hp) vs 113 kW (152 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 13,000 kg (28,700 lb) | 25,000 kg (55,100 lb) |
| Engine power | 113 kW (152 hp) | 222 kW (298 hp) |
| Net power | ≈113 kW (152 hp) | ≈222 kW (298 hp) |
| Bucket capacity | ≈2.0–2.5 m³ (2.6–3.3 yd³) | ≈3.4–8.0 m³ (4.4–10.5 yd³) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 926 review | Full L150H review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.