Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 926 vs Volvo L90H
The Volvo L90H is about 21% heavier than the Caterpillar 926 (15,750 vs 13,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Volvo L90H has about 14% more engine power (129 kW (173 hp) vs 113 kW (152 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 13,000 kg (28,700 lb) | 15,750 kg (34,700 lb) |
| Engine power | 113 kW (152 hp) | 129 kW (173 hp) |
| Net power | ≈113 kW (152 hp) | ≈129 kW (173 hp) |
| Bucket capacity | ≈2.0–2.5 m³ (2.6–3.3 yd³) | ≈2.5–3.5 m³ (3.3–4.6 yd³) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 926 review | Full L90H review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.