Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 938 vs Komatsu WA600-8
The Komatsu WA600-8 is about 239% heavier than the Caterpillar 938 (55,000 vs 16,229 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Komatsu WA600-8 has about 181% more engine power (393 kW (527 hp) vs 140 kW (188 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Komatsu in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 16,229 kg (35,800 lb) | 55,000 kg (121,300 lb) |
| Engine power | 140 kW (188 hp) | 393 kW (527 hp) |
| Net power | ≈140 kW (188 hp) | ≈393 kW (527 hp) |
| Bucket capacity | 2.5–5.0 m³ (3.3–6.5 yd³) | ≈6.4–7.6 m³ (8.4–9.9 yd³) |
| Static tipping load, full turn | ≈9,860–9,950 kg (21,737–21,934 lb) | — |
| Drive | Hydrostatic | — |
| Emissions | US EPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage V | — |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 938 review | Full WA600-8 review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.