Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Road roller

Caterpillar CS56B vs Dynapac CA2500D

The Caterpillar CS56B is about 5% heavier than the Dynapac CA2500D (11,000 vs 10,500 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Dynapac in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Caterpillar vibratory soil compactor (CS663E pictured)
Caterpillar Caterpillar CS56B
Dynapac single-drum road roller
Dynapac Dynapac CA2500D
Operating weight 11,000 kg (24,300 lb)10,500 kg (23,100 lb)
Engine power 97 kW (130 hp)—
Drum width ≈2.13 m (84 in)≈2.13 m (84 in)
Engine power ≈97 kW (130 hp)—
Drum Smooth or padfoot shell kitSmooth or padfoot
Strengths
  • + Optional Cat Compaction Control with GPS mapping
  • + Padfoot shell kit adds versatility
  • + Strong dealer support
  • + Proven, simple design
  • + Easy to maintain
  • + Widely available parts
Watch-outs
  • − Lighter than 13-tonne class machines for deep lifts
  • − Older designs lack modern compaction meters
Full CS56B reviewFull CA2500D review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.