Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Road roller

Caterpillar CS56B vs Dynapac CC4200

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Dynapac in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Caterpillar vibratory soil compactor (CS663E pictured)
Caterpillar Caterpillar CS56B
Dynapac tandem roller (CC232 pictured)
Dynapac Dynapac CC4200
Operating weight 11,000 kg (24,300 lb)11,000 kg (24,300 lb)
Engine power 97 kW (130 hp)—
Drum width ≈2.13 m (84 in)≈1.73 m (68 in)
Engine power ≈97 kW (130 hp)—
Drum Smooth or padfoot shell kit—
Type —Tandem vibratory
Strengths
  • + Optional Cat Compaction Control with GPS mapping
  • + Padfoot shell kit adds versatility
  • + Strong dealer support
  • + High compaction output
  • + Good visibility to drum edges
Watch-outs
  • − Lighter than 13-tonne class machines for deep lifts
  • − Large for urban work
Full CS56B reviewFull CC4200 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.