Comparison · Wheeled excavator
Caterpillar M314 vs Volvo EW160E
The Volvo EW160E is about 11% heavier than the Caterpillar M314 (17,250 vs 15,500 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Volvo EW160E has about 10% more engine power (115 kW (154 hp) vs 105 kW (141 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 15,500 kg (34,200 lb) | 17,250 kg (38,000 lb) |
| Engine power | 105 kW (141 hp) | 115 kW (154 hp) |
| Net power | ≈105 kW (141 hp) | ≈115 kW (154 hp) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full M314 review | Full EW160E review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.