Comparison · Wheeled excavator
Caterpillar M320 vs Komatsu PW148-11
The Caterpillar M320 is about 34% heavier than the Komatsu PW148-11 (21,500 vs 16,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar M320 has about 43% more engine power (129 kW (173 hp) vs 90 kW (121 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Komatsu in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 21,500 kg (47,400 lb) | 16,000 kg (35,300 lb) |
| Engine power | 129 kW (173 hp) | 90 kW (121 hp) |
| Net power | ≈129 kW (173 hp) | ≈90 kW (121 hp) |
| Tail swing | — | Short |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full M320 review | Full PW148-11 review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.