Comparison · Wheeled excavator
Caterpillar M320 vs Volvo EW160E
The Caterpillar M320 is about 25% heavier than the Volvo EW160E (21,500 vs 17,250 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar M320 has about 12% more engine power (129 kW (173 hp) vs 115 kW (154 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 21,500 kg (47,400 lb) | 17,250 kg (38,000 lb) |
| Engine power | 129 kW (173 hp) | 115 kW (154 hp) |
| Net power | ≈129 kW (173 hp) | ≈115 kW (154 hp) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full M320 review | Full EW160E review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.