Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Wheeled excavator

Caterpillar M320 vs Volvo EWR150E

The Caterpillar M320 is about 34% heavier than the Volvo EWR150E (21,500 vs 16,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Caterpillar M320 has about 12% more engine power (129 kW (173 hp) vs 115 kW (154 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Caterpillar machine similar to the Caterpillar M320 (related model may be pictured)
Caterpillar Caterpillar M320
Volvo EWR150E short-swing wheeled excavator
Volvo Construction Equipment Volvo EWR150E
Operating weight 21,500 kg (47,400 lb)16,000 kg (35,300 lb)
Engine power 129 kW (173 hp)115 kW (154 hp)
Net power ≈129 kW (173 hp)≈115 kW (154 hp)
Tail swing —Short swing radius
Travel speed —up to ≈35 km/h (22 mph)
Strengths
  • + High lift
  • + Cat technology
  • + Works within one traffic lane
  • + Comfortable Volvo cab
  • + Good lifting stability for its footprint
Watch-outs
  • − Heavy for road travel
  • − Short tail reduces counterweight compared with conventional models
Full M320 reviewFull EWR150E review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.