Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Forklift

Linde X20 vs Toyota 8FGU25

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Linde Material Handling and Toyota Material Handling in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Linde electric counterbalance forklift (E25 pictured)
Linde Material Handling Linde X20
Toyota internal-combustion forklift
Toyota Material Handling Toyota 8FGU25
Operating weight ——
Engine power ——
Rated capacity 2,000 kg (4,400 lb)2,270 kg (5,000 lb) at 500 mm (24 in)
Battery Integrated lithium-ion—
Use Indoor and outdoor—
Fuel —LPG or dual fuel
Tyres —Pneumatic
Engine —Toyota 4Y-series
Stability system —Toyota SAS
Strengths
  • + IC-like performance with zero emissions
  • + Fast opportunity charging
  • + Low centre of gravity
  • + Legendary reliability and resale value
  • + System of Active Stability reduces tip-over risk
  • + Comfortable for long shifts
Watch-outs
  • − Higher upfront cost
  • − Higher price than many competitors
  • − IC engines need ventilation indoors
Full X20 reviewFull 8FGU25 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.