Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Mobile crusher

Metso Lokotrack LT106 vs Sandvik QI442

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Metso and Sandvik in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Metso Lokotrack LT106 mobile jaw crusher in New York
Metso Metso Lokotrack LT106
Sandvik Sandvik QI442
Operating weight ——
Engine power ——
Crusher Nordberg C106 jaw—
Feed opening ≈1,060 × 700 mm (42 × 28 in)—
Capacity up to ≈400 t/h—
Weight ≈42 t—
Crusher type —Horizontal impact
Application —Recycling, limestone
Strengths
  • + Compact and easy to transport
  • + Proven jaw crusher
  • + Versatile for rock and recycling
  • + Cubical product
  • + Versatile
Watch-outs
  • − Output limited compared with larger jaw plants
  • − Wear costs in abrasive rock
Full Lokotrack LT106 reviewFull QI442 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.